Why observables have to be Hermitian (self-adjoint) operators?
In the realm of quantum information processing, it is essential to understand the significance of observables being Hermitian (self-adjoint) operators. This requirement stems from the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics and plays an important role in various quantum algorithms and protocols.
Hermitian operators are a class of linear operators that have a special property: their adjoint is equal to themselves. Mathematically, an operator ( A ) is Hermitian if it satisfies the condition ( A^dagger = A ), where ( A^dagger ) denotes the adjoint of the operator. In the context of quantum mechanics, observables are represented by Hermitian operators.
The Hermiticity of observables is deeply connected to the physical interpretation of quantum measurements. In quantum mechanics, observables correspond to physical quantities that can be measured, such as position, momentum, energy, or spin. When a measurement is performed on a quantum system, the outcome is one of the eigenvalues of the corresponding observable.
The requirement for observables to be Hermitian operators arises from the postulates of quantum mechanics. One of these postulates states that the possible outcomes of a measurement are the eigenvalues of the observable being measured. For a physical quantity to be observable, its corresponding operator must be Hermitian to guarantee that the eigenvalues are real.
Moreover, Hermitian operators have a important property related to their eigenvalues. The eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator are always real, which is a fundamental feature in quantum mechanics. This property ensures that the measurement outcomes are physically meaningful and correspond to observable quantities.
Additionally, Hermitian operators have orthogonal eigenvectors corresponding to distinct eigenvalues. This orthogonality property is essential for the spectral decomposition of Hermitian operators, which plays a central role in quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of unitary transformations and quantum information processing.
Unitary transformations are fundamental operations in quantum information processing, preserving the inner product and the norm of quantum states. When considering the evolution of quantum systems under unitary transformations, the observables involved must be represented by Hermitian operators to ensure the consistency and physical relevance of the measurement outcomes.
In quantum algorithms and quantum information protocols, observables represented by Hermitian operators are utilized in various ways. For instance, in quantum state tomography, where the complete characterization of a quantum state is performed through measurements of observables, the Hermiticity of these operators guarantees the reliability and accuracy of the reconstructed state.
Furthermore, in quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation, the properties of Hermitian operators play a important role in the design and implementation of error-correcting codes and fault-tolerant quantum gates. The use of Hermitian observables ensures the effectiveness and robustness of error detection and correction procedures in quantum information processing.
The requirement for observables to be Hermitian operators is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics and quantum information processing. The Hermiticity of observables ensures the physical interpretability of measurement outcomes, the reality of eigenvalues, and the consistency of quantum algorithms and protocols involving unitary transformations.
Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/QI/QIF Quantum Information Fundamentals:
- Are amplitudes of quantum states always real numbers?
- How the quantum negation gate (quantum NOT or Pauli-X gate) operates?
- Why is the Hadamard gate self-reversible?
- If measure the 1st qubit of the Bell state in a certain basis and then measure the 2nd qubit in a basis rotated by a certain angle theta, the probability that you will obtain projection to the corresponding vector is equal to the square of sine of theta?
- How many bits of classical information would be required to describe the state of an arbitrary qubit superposition?
- How many dimensions has a space of 3 qubits?
- Will the measurement of a qubit destroy its quantum superposition?
- Can quantum gates have more inputs than outputs similarily as classical gates?
- Does the universal family of quantum gates include the CNOT gate and the Hadamard gate?
- What is a double-slit experiment?
View more questions and answers in EITC/QI/QIF Quantum Information Fundamentals