Describe the measurement outcomes of entangled qubits in the bit and sign bases and how they relate to the EPR paradox.
The measurement outcomes of entangled qubits in the bit and sign bases play a important role in understanding the EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) paradox. The EPR paradox refers to a thought experiment proposed by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen in 1935, which highlighted the apparent conflict between quantum mechanics and classical physics. In this paradox, two entangled particles, such as qubits, are prepared in a way that their properties become correlated, even when separated by a large distance. The measurement outcomes of these entangled qubits in different bases help illustrate the paradox and its implications.
To understand the measurement outcomes, let's first consider the bit basis. In the bit basis, the qubit can be in either the state |0⟩ or |1⟩, representing the classical bits 0 and 1, respectively. When two qubits are entangled, their states become correlated, so measuring one qubit in the bit basis will determine the state of the other qubit instantaneously, regardless of the spatial separation between them. For example, if one qubit is measured and found to be in the state |0⟩, the other qubit will be in the state |0⟩ as well, even if it is located far away.
Now, let's move on to the sign basis. In the sign basis, the qubit can be in the state |+⟩ or |-⟩, which are superpositions of the bit basis states |0⟩ and |1⟩. The state |+⟩ is defined as (|0⟩ + |1⟩)/√2, and the state |-⟩ is defined as (|0⟩ – |1⟩)/√2. When two qubits are entangled, measuring one qubit in the sign basis will also determine the state of the other qubit instantaneously. However, the measurement outcomes in the sign basis can be more interesting. For instance, if one qubit is measured and found to be in the state |+⟩, the other qubit will also be in the state |+⟩. However, if one qubit is measured and found to be in the state |-⟩, the other qubit will be in the state |-⟩ as well. This implies that the measurement outcomes in the sign basis are perfectly correlated, regardless of the separation between the qubits.
The measurement outcomes of entangled qubits in the bit and sign bases are closely related to the EPR paradox. According to classical physics, the properties of physical objects are determined independently of the act of measurement. However, in quantum mechanics, the measurement outcomes of entangled qubits in different bases are instantaneously correlated, even when the qubits are separated by large distances. This phenomenon, known as "quantum entanglement," challenges the classical notion of local realism, which suggests that physical properties exist independently of measurement.
The EPR paradox arises from the fact that the measurement outcomes of entangled qubits in different bases cannot be explained by classical physics alone. The correlations between the measurement outcomes violate the principle of local realism, as the measurement of one qubit instantaneously affects the state of the other qubit, regardless of the distance between them. This paradox highlights the non-local nature of entanglement and the need for a quantum mechanical description to explain the observed phenomena.
The measurement outcomes of entangled qubits in the bit and sign bases provide insights into the EPR paradox. These outcomes demonstrate the instantaneous correlation between the states of entangled qubits, challenging the classical notion of local realism. Understanding the measurement outcomes in different bases is important for comprehending the implications of quantum entanglement and its role in the EPR paradox.
Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/QI/QIF Quantum Information Fundamentals:
- Are amplitudes of quantum states always real numbers?
- How the quantum negation gate (quantum NOT or Pauli-X gate) operates?
- Why is the Hadamard gate self-reversible?
- If measure the 1st qubit of the Bell state in a certain basis and then measure the 2nd qubit in a basis rotated by a certain angle theta, the probability that you will obtain projection to the corresponding vector is equal to the square of sine of theta?
- How many bits of classical information would be required to describe the state of an arbitrary qubit superposition?
- How many dimensions has a space of 3 qubits?
- Will the measurement of a qubit destroy its quantum superposition?
- Can quantum gates have more inputs than outputs similarily as classical gates?
- Does the universal family of quantum gates include the CNOT gate and the Hadamard gate?
- What is a double-slit experiment?
View more questions and answers in EITC/QI/QIF Quantum Information Fundamentals