How does the energy measurement of a superposition state differ from that of an eigenstate?
In the field of quantum information, the measurement of energy in a superposition state differs from that of an eigenstate. To understand this difference, we need to consider the concepts of superposition and eigenstates, as well as the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics.
In quantum mechanics, a superposition state is a state in which a quantum system exists in a combination of multiple states simultaneously. Mathematically, this is represented by the linear combination of eigenstates, where each eigenstate is associated with a specific energy value. The coefficients in the linear combination determine the probability amplitudes of each eigenstate.
On the other hand, an eigenstate is a state in which a quantum system is in a definite energy state. It is a solution to the time-independent Schrödinger equation, which describes the behavior of quantum systems. The eigenstates of the Hamiltonian operator, which represents the energy of the system, correspond to the energy eigenvalues of the system.
When it comes to energy measurements, the key difference between a superposition state and an eigenstate lies in the probabilities associated with the measurement outcomes. In an eigenstate, the energy measurement will always yield a specific eigenvalue with certainty. For example, if the system is in the ground state eigenstate, the energy measurement will always yield the ground state energy.
In contrast, in a superposition state, the energy measurement will yield one of the possible energy eigenvalues associated with the superposition state. The probability of obtaining a particular eigenvalue is given by the squared magnitude of the corresponding coefficient in the superposition state. For instance, if a superposition state is a linear combination of the ground state and the first excited state, the energy measurement will have a certain probability of yielding the ground state energy and another probability of yielding the first excited state energy.
To illustrate this further, consider an electron in a superposition state of spin-up and spin-down states. The energy measurement in this case corresponds to the measurement of the magnetic moment of the electron. If the electron is in a superposition state with equal coefficients for spin-up and spin-down, the energy measurement will have a 50% probability of yielding the energy associated with spin-up and a 50% probability of yielding the energy associated with spin-down.
The energy measurement of a superposition state differs from that of an eigenstate in terms of the probabilities associated with the measurement outcomes. While an eigenstate yields a specific energy value with certainty, a superposition state yields one of the possible energy eigenvalues with probabilities determined by the coefficients in the superposition state.
Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/QI/QIF Quantum Information Fundamentals:
- Are amplitudes of quantum states always real numbers?
- How the quantum negation gate (quantum NOT or Pauli-X gate) operates?
- Why is the Hadamard gate self-reversible?
- If measure the 1st qubit of the Bell state in a certain basis and then measure the 2nd qubit in a basis rotated by a certain angle theta, the probability that you will obtain projection to the corresponding vector is equal to the square of sine of theta?
- How many bits of classical information would be required to describe the state of an arbitrary qubit superposition?
- How many dimensions has a space of 3 qubits?
- Will the measurement of a qubit destroy its quantum superposition?
- Can quantum gates have more inputs than outputs similarily as classical gates?
- Does the universal family of quantum gates include the CNOT gate and the Hadamard gate?
- What is a double-slit experiment?
View more questions and answers in EITC/QI/QIF Quantum Information Fundamentals