What are the two equivalent ways to specify a measurement in quantum information, and how do they relate to each other?
In the field of quantum information, there are two equivalent ways to specify a measurement: the eigenvalue-eigenstate approach and the operator approach. These two approaches are intimately related and provide different perspectives on the same physical process.
In the eigenvalue-eigenstate approach, measurements are described in terms of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the observable being measured. An observable is a Hermitian operator that represents a physical quantity, such as position, momentum, or spin. The eigenvalues of the observable correspond to the possible outcomes of the measurement, while the eigenvectors represent the states in which the system can be found after the measurement.
To perform a measurement using the eigenvalue-eigenstate approach, we first need to express the state of the system as a linear combination of the eigenvectors of the observable. The probability of obtaining a particular eigenvalue is given by the squared magnitude of the corresponding coefficient in the expansion. After the measurement, the system collapses into the corresponding eigenvector associated with the observed eigenvalue.
For example, consider a spin-1/2 particle in a magnetic field. The observable in this case is the z-component of the spin, which has eigenvalues +1/2 and -1/2. If the system is initially in the state |+z⟩, which is an eigenvector of the observable with eigenvalue +1/2, the probability of measuring +1/2 is 1, and the system will remain in the state |+z⟩ after the measurement. If the system is instead in the state |-z⟩, which is an eigenvector of the observable with eigenvalue -1/2, the probability of measuring +1/2 is 0, and the system will collapse into the state |-z⟩ after the measurement.
The operator approach, on the other hand, describes measurements in terms of the operators themselves. Instead of working with the eigenvalues and eigenvectors, we use the operator corresponding to the observable to calculate the expectation value and the variance of the measurement outcomes. The expectation value represents the average value of the observable in a given state, while the variance characterizes the spread of the measurement outcomes.
To calculate the expectation value, we take the inner product of the state vector with the operator applied to the state vector. The variance is then obtained by calculating the expectation value of the square of the difference between the operator and its expectation value. These quantities provide statistical information about the measurement outcomes and can be used to analyze the behavior of quantum systems.
For instance, let's consider a particle in a one-dimensional infinite square well potential. The observable in this case is the position of the particle, which is represented by the position operator. By calculating the expectation value of the position operator in a given state, we can determine the average position of the particle. Similarly, by calculating the variance, we can obtain information about the spread of the particle's position.
The eigenvalue-eigenstate approach and the operator approach are mathematically equivalent and provide complementary descriptions of measurements in quantum information. The former focuses on the outcomes and states of the system, while the latter emphasizes the statistical properties of the measurements. Both approaches are used extensively in quantum information theory and are essential tools for understanding and analyzing quantum systems.
The eigenvalue-eigenstate approach and the operator approach are two equivalent ways to specify a measurement in quantum information. The former describes measurements in terms of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the observable, while the latter employs the operator itself to calculate statistical quantities. These approaches provide different perspectives on the measurement process and are both fundamental in the study of quantum information.
Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/QI/QIF Quantum Information Fundamentals:
- Are amplitudes of quantum states always real numbers?
- How the quantum negation gate (quantum NOT or Pauli-X gate) operates?
- Why is the Hadamard gate self-reversible?
- If measure the 1st qubit of the Bell state in a certain basis and then measure the 2nd qubit in a basis rotated by a certain angle theta, the probability that you will obtain projection to the corresponding vector is equal to the square of sine of theta?
- How many bits of classical information would be required to describe the state of an arbitrary qubit superposition?
- How many dimensions has a space of 3 qubits?
- Will the measurement of a qubit destroy its quantum superposition?
- Can quantum gates have more inputs than outputs similarily as classical gates?
- Does the universal family of quantum gates include the CNOT gate and the Hadamard gate?
- What is a double-slit experiment?
View more questions and answers in EITC/QI/QIF Quantum Information Fundamentals