The BB84 protocol and the six state protocol are two widely used quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols that ensure secure communication by exploiting the principles of quantum mechanics. While both protocols aim to establish a shared secret key between two parties, they differ in terms of the number of bases used for measurement.
The BB84 protocol, named after its inventors Charles Bennett and Gilles Brassard, utilizes two non-orthogonal bases, typically denoted as rectilinear (|0⟩, |1⟩) and diagonal (|+⟩, |−⟩), for encoding and measuring qubits. In this protocol, the sender randomly chooses one of the two bases for each qubit and prepares it accordingly. The receiver also randomly selects one of the two bases for measurement. If the sender and receiver use the same basis, the measurement outcome will be deterministic. However, if they use different bases, the measurement outcome will be random. By comparing a subset of their measurement outcomes, the sender and receiver can estimate the error rate caused by eavesdropping and discard suspicious bits. The remaining bits can be used as a shared secret key.
On the other hand, the six state protocol, also known as the B92 protocol, was proposed by Artur Ekert. Unlike the BB84 protocol, the six state protocol employs three non-orthogonal bases, denoted as rectilinear (|0⟩, |1⟩), diagonal (|+⟩, |−⟩), and circular (|↺⟩, |↻⟩). The sender randomly chooses one of these three bases for each qubit and prepares it accordingly. Similarly, the receiver also randomly selects one of the three bases for measurement. If the sender and receiver use the same basis, the measurement outcome will be deterministic, while different bases yield random outcomes. By comparing a subset of their measurement outcomes, the sender and receiver can estimate the error rate and establish a secure key.
To summarize, the BB84 protocol uses two non-orthogonal bases (rectilinear and diagonal) for qubit measurement, whereas the six state protocol employs three non-orthogonal bases (rectilinear, diagonal, and circular). The additional circular basis in the six state protocol provides an extra dimension for encoding and measuring qubits, potentially enhancing the security of the protocol.
The BB84 protocol and the six state protocol differ in terms of the number of bases used for measurement. The BB84 protocol uses two non-orthogonal bases, while the six state protocol utilizes three non-orthogonal bases. These differences contribute to the distinct security properties and performance characteristics of each protocol.
Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/IS/QCF Quantum Cryptography Fundamentals:
- How does the detector control attack exploit single-photon detectors, and what are the implications for the security of Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) systems?
- What are some of the countermeasures developed to combat the PNS attack, and how do they enhance the security of Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) protocols?
- What is the Photon Number Splitting (PNS) attack, and how does it constrain the communication distance in quantum cryptography?
- How do single photon detectors operate in the context of the Canadian Quantum Satellite, and what challenges do they face in space?
- What are the key components of the Canadian Quantum Satellite project, and why is the telescope a critical element for effective quantum communication?
- What measures can be taken to protect against the bright-light Trojan-horse attack in QKD systems?
- How do practical implementations of QKD systems differ from their theoretical models, and what are the implications of these differences for security?
- Why is it important to involve ethical hackers in the testing of QKD systems, and what role do they play in identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities?
- What are the main differences between intercept-resend attacks and photon number splitting attacks in the context of QKD systems?
- How does the Heisenberg uncertainty principle contribute to the security of Quantum Key Distribution (QKD)?
View more questions and answers in EITC/IS/QCF Quantum Cryptography Fundamentals

