The recursion theorem, a fundamental concept in computational complexity theory, guarantees the existence of a fixed point for a computable function T. To illustrate this, let's consider a specific example of a computable function and explain how the recursion theorem applies.
Suppose we have a computable function T that takes as input a binary string and outputs a binary string. Let's define T as follows:
T(x) = x + "01"
In this example, T appends the binary string "01" to the input string x. For instance, if x = "110", T(x) would be "11001".
Now, let's discuss how the recursion theorem guarantees the existence of a fixed point for this function. The recursion theorem states that for any computable function T, there exists a binary string y such that T(y) = y. In other words, there exists an input string y that, when passed to T, produces itself as the output.
To prove the existence of a fixed point for our example function T, we can construct a fixed point explicitly. Let's consider the binary string y = "01". When we apply T to y, we get T(y) = "0101". In this case, T(y) is equal to y, making y a fixed point of T.
The recursion theorem guarantees the existence of such a fixed point for any computable function T. It does so by employing a diagonalization argument. The idea is to construct a new binary string y by iteratively applying T to a sequence of strings, and then showing that this constructed y satisfies T(y) = y. By construction, this y is a fixed point of T.
The recursion theorem has significant didactic value in computational complexity theory. It provides a formal framework for reasoning about the existence of fixed points in computable functions. This is important in various areas of computer science, including program analysis, formal verification, and algorithm design.
To summarize, the recursion theorem guarantees the existence of a fixed point for any computable function. In the example we discussed, the function T appends the binary string "01" to its input. The recursion theorem allows us to construct a fixed point, such as the string "01", where T(y) = y. This theorem has practical implications in various areas of computer science.
Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/IS/CCTF Computational Complexity Theory Fundamentals:
- Are regular languages equivalent with Finite State Machines?
- Is PSPACE class not equal to the EXPSPACE class?
- Is algorithmically computable problem a problem computable by a Turing Machine accordingly to the Church-Turing Thesis?
- What is the closure property of regular languages under concatenation? How are finite state machines combined to represent the union of languages recognized by two machines?
- Can every arbitrary problem be expressed as a language?
- Is P complexity class a subset of PSPACE class?
- Does every multi-tape Turing machine has an equivalent single-tape Turing machine?
- What are the outputs of predicates?
- Are lambda calculus and turing machines computable models that answers the question on what does computable mean?
- Can we can prove that Np and P class are the same by finding an efficient polynomial solution for any NP complete problem on a deterministic TM?
View more questions and answers in EITC/IS/CCTF Computational Complexity Theory Fundamentals

