In the context of untrusted storage servers, what is the significance of maintaining a consistent and verifiable log of operations, and how can this be achieved?

by EITCA Academy / Wednesday, 12 June 2024 / Published in Cybersecurity, EITC/IS/ACSS Advanced Computer Systems Security, Security of storage, Untrusted storage servers, Examination review

In the realm of cybersecurity, particularly concerning the security of storage on untrusted storage servers, the maintenance of a consistent and verifiable log of operations is paramount. This requirement stems from the necessity to ensure data integrity, availability, and confidentiality in environments where the storage infrastructure cannot be fully trusted. Untrusted storage servers pose significant risks, including unauthorized data modification, deletion, and unauthorized access. Thus, a consistent and verifiable log of operations plays a important role in mitigating these risks.

A consistent log of operations refers to a sequential and chronological record of all actions performed on the data stored on the server. This log should be immutable and tamper-evident, ensuring that any unauthorized alterations can be detected. The significance of such a log lies in its ability to provide an accurate and reliable history of all interactions with the data, which is essential for auditing, forensic analysis, and compliance with regulatory requirements.

To achieve a consistent and verifiable log of operations, several techniques and technologies can be employed. These include cryptographic methods, secure logging mechanisms, and consensus protocols. Below, we consider these methods in detail:

Cryptographic Methods

1. Hash Chains: A hash chain is a sequence of hash values where each hash value is dependent on the previous one. This creates a link between each log entry, ensuring that any modification to an entry will break the chain. For example, if the log entries are represented by $L_1, L_2, ..., L_n$ , the hash chain can be constructed as follows:

$H_1 = H(L_1), \quad H_2 = H(H_1 || L_2), \quad ..., \quad H_n = H(H_{n-1} || L_n)$

where $H$ denotes a cryptographic hash function, and $||$ represents concatenation. This structure ensures that any tampering with a log entry $L_i$ will result in a mismatch in subsequent hash values, thereby revealing the tampering.

2. Digital Signatures: Each log entry can be digitally signed by a trusted party using asymmetric cryptography. A digital signature provides authenticity and integrity, as it can be verified using the public key of the signer. For instance, if a log entry $L_i$ is signed with a private key $K_{priv}$ , the signature $S_i = \text{Sign}(K_{priv}, L_i)$ can be verified by anyone with access to the corresponding public key $K_{pub}$ . This method ensures that any alteration to $L_i$ will invalidate the signature.

3. Merkle Trees: A Merkle tree is a binary tree where each leaf node represents a hash of a log entry, and each internal node represents the hash of its child nodes. The root of the Merkle tree, known as the Merkle root, provides a single hash value that represents the entire set of log entries. The Merkle tree structure allows for efficient and verifiable proof of inclusion, meaning that one can prove whether a particular log entry is part of the log without revealing the entire log. This is particularly useful for maintaining privacy while ensuring integrity.

Secure Logging Mechanisms

1. Append-Only Logs: An append-only log is a log structure where entries can only be added and not modified or deleted. This immutability ensures that once an entry is recorded, it remains in the log permanently. Implementing append-only logs typically involves using write-once-read-many (WORM) storage media or employing software-based mechanisms that prevent modifications to existing log entries.

2. Blockchain Technology: Blockchain is a decentralized and distributed ledger technology that inherently provides a consistent and verifiable log of operations. Each block in the blockchain contains a list of transactions (log entries), a timestamp, and a cryptographic hash of the previous block. This chaining of blocks ensures that any tampering with a block will invalidate the subsequent blocks. Blockchain technology also employs consensus protocols to achieve agreement among distributed nodes, further enhancing the security and reliability of the log.

3. Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs): TEEs, such as Intel SGX or ARM TrustZone, provide a secure enclave within a processor where code and data can be executed and stored securely. By leveraging TEEs, one can ensure that log entries are recorded and maintained in a secure and isolated environment, protected from tampering by the untrusted storage server. TEEs can also be used to securely generate and store cryptographic keys used for signing log entries.

Consensus Protocols

In distributed systems, achieving consistency and verifiability of logs often requires consensus protocols to ensure that all nodes in the system agree on the order and content of log entries. Some commonly used consensus protocols include:

1. Paxos: Paxos is a family of consensus protocols designed to achieve agreement among distributed nodes in the presence of failures. Paxos ensures that all non-faulty nodes agree on the same sequence of log entries, providing consistency and fault tolerance.

2. Raft: Raft is another consensus algorithm that is designed to be more understandable and easier to implement than Paxos. Raft divides the consensus process into leader election, log replication, and safety, ensuring that the distributed log remains consistent and verifiable.

3. Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT): BFT protocols, such as Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT), are designed to achieve consensus in systems where nodes may exhibit arbitrary (Byzantine) faults, including malicious behavior. BFT protocols ensure that the log remains consistent and verifiable even in the presence of malicious nodes.

Practical Example

Consider a scenario where a financial institution uses an untrusted cloud storage service to store transaction logs. To ensure the integrity and verifiability of these logs, the institution can implement the following measures:

1. Hash Chains: Each transaction log entry is hashed and linked to the previous entry using a hash chain. This ensures that any tampering with a log entry will be detectable.

2. Digital Signatures: Each log entry is digitally signed by the institution's private key. This provides authenticity and non-repudiation, as the signature can be verified using the institution's public key.

3. Merkle Trees: The institution periodically constructs a Merkle tree of the log entries and publishes the Merkle root on a public bulletin board or blockchain. This allows anyone to verify the integrity of the log entries without accessing the entire log.

4. Blockchain: The institution can also record the transaction logs on a private blockchain. The decentralized nature of the blockchain ensures that the log remains consistent and verifiable, even in the presence of untrusted storage servers.

5. TEEs: The institution can leverage TEEs to securely record and store log entries within a secure enclave, protecting them from tampering by the untrusted storage server.

6. Consensus Protocols: If the institution uses a distributed storage system, it can employ consensus protocols such as Raft or PBFT to ensure that all nodes agree on the order and content of the transaction logs.

By implementing these measures, the financial institution can maintain a consistent and verifiable log of operations, ensuring the integrity, availability, and confidentiality of its transaction logs, even when using untrusted storage servers.

EITCA Academy