How does the Diffie-Hellman key exchange mechanism work to establish a shared secret between two parties over an unsecured channel, and what are the steps involved?

by EITCA Academy / Wednesday, 12 June 2024 / Published in Cybersecurity, EITC/IS/ACC Advanced Classical Cryptography, Man-in-the-middle attack, Man-in-the-middle attack, certificates and PKI, Examination review

The Diffie-Hellman key exchange mechanism is a fundamental cryptographic protocol that allows two parties to establish a shared secret over an unsecured communication channel. This shared secret can subsequently be used to encrypt further communications using symmetric key cryptography. The protocol is named after its inventors, Whitfield Diffie and Martin Hellman, who introduced it in 1976. The strength of the Diffie-Hellman key exchange lies in the difficulty of solving the discrete logarithm problem, which underpins its security.

The mechanism operates as follows:

1. Parameter Selection: Both parties agree on two parameters: a large prime number $p$ and a generator $g$ of the multiplicative group of integers modulo $p$ . These parameters do not need to be kept secret, and they can be shared openly. The prime number $p$ should be sufficiently large to ensure security, typically at least 2048 bits in modern applications.

2. Private Key Generation: Each party generates a private key. Let’s denote the two parties as Alice and Bob. Alice selects a private key $a$ , which is a random integer such that $1 \leq a \leq p-2$ . Similarly, Bob selects a private key $b$ , which is also a random integer in the same range.

3. Public Key Computation: Using their private keys, both parties compute their respective public keys. Alice computes her public key $A$ as:

$A = g^a \mod p$

Bob computes his public key $B$ as:

$B = g^b \mod p$

These public keys are then exchanged over the unsecured channel.

4. Shared Secret Computation: Upon receiving each other's public keys, both parties compute the shared secret. Alice computes the shared secret $s$ using Bob's public key $B$ and her private key $a$ :

$s = B^a \mod p$

Similarly, Bob computes the shared secret $s$ using Alice's public key $A$ and his private key $b$ :

$s = A^b \mod p$

Due to the properties of modular arithmetic, both computations yield the same result:

$s = g^{ab} \mod p$

This shared secret $s$ is now known only to Alice and Bob and can be used as a symmetric key for further encrypted communication.

The security of the Diffie-Hellman key exchange is based on the computational difficulty of the discrete logarithm problem. Given $g$ , $p$ , and $g^a \mod p$ , it is computationally infeasible to determine $a$ if $p$ is sufficiently large. This ensures that an eavesdropper, who might have access to $g$ , $p$ , $A$ , and $B$ , cannot easily compute the shared secret.

Man-in-the-Middle Attack

Despite its theoretical security, the Diffie-Hellman key exchange is vulnerable to a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack if not properly authenticated. In a MitM attack, an adversary intercepts the communication between Alice and Bob and establishes separate key exchanges with each party. The attacker, Eve, can then decrypt, modify, and re-encrypt messages between Alice and Bob without their knowledge.

The steps of a MitM attack on Diffie-Hellman are as follows:

1. Interception: Eve intercepts the public keys exchanged between Alice and Bob.
2. Fake Key Exchange: Eve generates her own private key $e$ and computes her public key $E = g^e \mod p$ . She then sends her public key $E$ to both Alice and Bob, pretending to be the other party.
3. Separate Shared Secrets: Alice computes a shared secret with Eve, $s_A = E^a \mod p$ , believing it to be with Bob. Similarly, Bob computes a shared secret with Eve, $s_B = E^b \mod p$ , believing it to be with Alice.
4. Interception and Decryption: Eve now has two shared secrets, $s_A$ and $s_B$ , which she can use to decrypt messages from Alice, modify them if desired, and then re-encrypt them using $s_B$ before sending them to Bob, and vice versa.

Mitigating Man-in-the-Middle Attacks

To prevent MitM attacks, it is essential to authenticate the parties involved in the key exchange. This can be achieved using digital certificates and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). Here is how it works:

1. Digital Certificates: Each party possesses a digital certificate issued by a trusted Certificate Authority (CA). The certificate contains the party's public key and identity information, and it is digitally signed by the CA.
2. Verification: When Alice and Bob exchange public keys, they also exchange their digital certificates. Each party verifies the other's certificate using the CA's public key. This ensures that the public key indeed belongs to the claimed party.
3. Authenticated Key Exchange: Once the certificates are verified, Alice and Bob can proceed with the Diffie-Hellman key exchange, confident that they are communicating with the intended party.

Example

Consider an example with specific numbers to illustrate the Diffie-Hellman key exchange:

1. Parameter Selection:
– Prime number $p = 23$
– Generator $g = 5$

2. Private Key Generation:
– Alice's private key $a = 6$
– Bob's private key $b = 15$

3. Public Key Computation:
– Alice computes her public key $A = 5^6 \mod 23 = 8$
– Bob computes his public key $B = 5^{15} \mod 23 = 19$

4. Public Key Exchange:
– Alice sends $A = 8$ to Bob
– Bob sends $B = 19$ to Alice

5. Shared Secret Computation:
– Alice computes $s = 19^6 \mod 23 = 2$
– Bob computes $s = 8^{15} \mod 23 = 2$

Both Alice and Bob now share the secret $s = 2$ .

Importance of Parameter Selection

The selection of parameters $p$ and $g$ is important for the security of the Diffie-Hellman key exchange. The prime number $p$ should be large enough to prevent brute-force attacks. A commonly used large prime is a Sophie Germain prime, where $p = 2q + 1$ and $q$ is also a prime. The generator $g$ should be a primitive root modulo $p$ , meaning that the powers of $g$ modulo $p$ generate all the integers from 1 to $p-1$ .

Advanced Considerations

In modern implementations, the Diffie-Hellman key exchange often uses elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) instead of traditional modular arithmetic. Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) offers the same level of security with smaller key sizes, leading to faster computations and reduced storage requirements.

Conclusion

The Diffie-Hellman key exchange is a foundational protocol in cryptography, enabling secure communication over unsecured channels. Its security is based on the difficulty of the discrete logarithm problem. However, it is vulnerable to MitM attacks if not authenticated. Digital certificates and PKI are essential for verifying the identities of the parties involved and ensuring the integrity of the key exchange. As cryptographic techniques evolve, the use of ECC in Diffie-Hellman key exchanges provides enhanced security and efficiency.

EITCA Academy

How does the Diffie-Hellman key exchange mechanism work to establish a shared secret between two parties over an unsecured channel, and what are the steps involved?

Man-in-the-Middle Attack

Mitigating Man-in-the-Middle Attacks

Example

Importance of Parameter Selection

Advanced Considerations

Conclusion

Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/IS/ACC Advanced Classical Cryptography:

More questions and answers:

EITCA Academy is a part of the European IT Certification framework

EITCA Academy

SIGN IN YOUR ACCOUNT TO HAVE ACCESS TO DIFFERENT FEATURES

FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

CREATE ACCOUNT

How does the Diffie-Hellman key exchange mechanism work to establish a shared secret between two parties over an unsecured channel, and what are the steps involved?

Man-in-the-Middle Attack

Mitigating Man-in-the-Middle Attacks

Example

Importance of Parameter Selection

Advanced Considerations

Conclusion

Other recent questions and answers regarding EITC/IS/ACC Advanced Classical Cryptography:

More questions and answers: